|
|
Detailed schedule
Click on a link for more details
Show all the abstracts
Show all the abstracts
Thursday 11:00:00 Timetabling in education and sport Room 126 - Chair: G. Vanden Berghe
Thursday 11:00:00 Transportation management Room 130 - Chair: F. Semet
Thursday 11:00:00 Networks Room 138 - Chair: B. Fortz
Thursday 11:00:00 Nonconvex optimization 1 Room 035 - Chair: F. Bach
Thursday 14:00:00 Constraint programming models 1 Room 126 - Chair: Y. Deville
Thursday 14:00:00 Vehicle routing Room 130 - Chair: S. Limbourg
Thursday 14:00:00 Combinatorial optimization and IP applications Room 138 - Chair: Q. Louveaux
Thursday 14:00:00 Nonconvex Optimization 2 Room 035 - Chair: R. Sepulchre
Thursday 16:10:00 Constraint programming models 2 Room 126 - Chair: P. Schaus
Thursday 16:10:00 Performance modeling Room 130 - Chair: G. Janssens
Thursday 16:10:00 Scheduling Room 138 - Chair: K. Sorensen
Thursday 16:10:00 Planning under uncertainty Room 035 - Chair: R. Leus
Friday 09:00:00 Metaheuristics Room 126 - Chair: J. Teghem
Friday 09:25:00 Production and distribution (9:25) Room 130 - Chair: Y. Arda
Friday 09:00:00 Multiple criteria Room 138 - Chair: R. Bisdorff
- Regional Development in a Well-Being Economy: The Case of Lithuania
Willem K. Brauers (University of Antwerp) Co-authors: R. Ginevicius, R. Bisdorff Abstract: Willem Karel M. Brauers 1) and Romualdas Ginevicius2)
1) Faculty of Applied Economics and Institute for Development
Policy and Management, University of Antwerp, Belgium
2) Department of Enterprise Economics and Business Management,
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius-40, Lithuania
ABSTRACT
The computation of a Regional Income, being an exponent of the welfare
economy, is not sufficient for the measurement of the well being of a
regional population. The well-being economy goes further. In the
well-being economy, each individual would have to feel good concerning
material wealth, health, education, all kind of security and concerning
the environment. With other words, multiple objectives have to be
fulfilled. Moreover, these different multiple objectives are expressed
in different units. Weights are most of the time used to equalize these
different units. However, introduction of weights means also
introduction of subjectivity. In order to avoid this dilemma, the
internal mechanical solution of a ratio system, producing dimensionless
numbers, is preferred. In addition, the use of the obtained ratios
creates the opportunity to come to a non-subjective reference point
theory. This double approach is called the MOORA Method (Multiple
Objectives Optimization by Ratio Analysis). The choice and importance of
the objectives is also non-subjective if all stakeholders involved come
to an agreement. This theory is applied on the different regions of
Lithuania. A redistribution of income has to take place from the well
being Lithuanian regions to the poorer regions, but under limiting
conditions and for well defined and eventually controlled projects.
- Evaluation of multi-criteria techniques for project portfolio management
Sylvie Busschaert (University of Antwerp)
- Multicriteria decision making in a multi-level manpower system
Marie-anne Guerry (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
- Sensitivity analysis of the additive model in data envelopment analysis while inputs and outputs are fuzzy data
Mahsa Faizrahnemoon (Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research Branch) Co-authors: A. Davoodi
Friday 09:25:00 Stochastic models (9:25) Room 035 - Chair: L. Esch
Friday 11:00:00 Constraint programming and Supply Chain Management Room 126 - Chair: Y. Deville
Friday 11:00:00 OR in health management Room 130 - Chair: P. De Causmaecker
Friday 11:00:00 Rankings and importance indices Room 138 - Chair: JL. Marichal
Friday 11:00:00 Queueing Room 035 - Chair: S. Wittevrongel
Friday 15:10:00 Optimization software Room 126 - Chair: E. Loute
Friday 15:10:00 Integrated operations planning Room 130 - Chair: B. Raa
Friday 15:10:00 Cycles in graphs Room 138 - Chair: F. Spieksma
|
|